Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cartopedia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. X clamation point  06:37, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Cartopedia

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable; no real reliable sources. D.M.N. (talk) 12:05, 15 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep - There are reviews of the software in reliable sources. For example, The New York Times, The School Library Journal, and the Washington times.  There are more but this suffices to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 21:45, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep- The review from the Washington Post Times should be enough to establish notability. --J.Mundo (talk) 14:58, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - Just to clarify, the review I found is from the Washington Times, and not the Washington Post. -- Whpq (talk) 14:59, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for catching my mistake. --J.Mundo (talk) 15:45, 19 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep appears to be notable enough, sources exist (a few have been mentioned by Whpq, others can be found via Google), although I wouldn't oppose a merge to Dorling Kindersley (per WP:PRODUCT) if a products section is added to the article about the company. — Snigbrook 22:54, 19 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.