Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cartosat-2F


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination was withdrawn and sources have been found. (non-admin closure) CoolSkittle  (talk) 20:24, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Cartosat-2F

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable and Unsourced RhinosF1(chat) (status)(contribs) 08:30, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  ~Ruyaba~   {talk}  09:39, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  ~Ruyaba~   {talk}  09:39, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep All the other satellites in this series have decent articles (see Cartosat-1 through Cartosat-2E). The article as it stands needs work to expand the content and add references, but deletion would leave a strange blank in an interesting series of articles. Girth Summit  (blether)  11:50, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 20:08, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment I did a quick trawl to help others decide - here are some additional sources that could improve the article: Indian Government Website, The Hindu, International Business Times; also this website appears to have an editorial board, and is independent. I think it's notable, and there's enough to build a more substantial article around. At the very least, this could be redirected to the Cartosat-2 page rather than deleting, although I think keeping the article and filling it in further would be a preferable choice. Girth Summit  (blether)  10:51, 28 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep, I added prose for the citations listed by Girth Summit above and for some others I have found. This resolves the single source and primary source banners. For notability, several distinguishing features were discussed in the citations, e.g. it is 100th satellite orbited by PSLV, the third in the series launch w/i one year, has sub meter resolution camera, was originally a ground dummy/spare.--Cincotta1 (talk) 22:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Now Keep - Changes made since satisfy problems. RhinosF1(chat) (status)(contribs) 23:11, 1 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.