Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caryn Ann Harlos


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 20:27, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Caryn Ann Harlos

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Unencyclopedic content. May fail WP:BASIC. Also applicable:WP:NOT, WP:PROMO. As mentioned on the article’s talk page, it appears that many of the edits may have been performed by the subject of the article and possible affiliates. WP:COISELF. RegularH (talk) 17:53, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Women, Libertarianism,  and Colorado. Curbon7 (talk) 18:15, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: is a single-purpose account and has edited no other articles outside this subject area. —C.Fred (talk) 18:26, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete: There are a lot of sources here, but around half of them are primary sources like convention minutes, various LP websites, tweets, and a couple LP-affiliated wikis. Of the non-primary sources, the vast majority are one-line mentions quoting Harlos as a spokesperson for the LP and do not represent in-depth coverage of Harlos herself. The only sources that I think pass the scrutiny test for notability are the Denver Post, Parliamentarians, and The Colorado Independent, but even that stretches it a bit. Overall, Harlos appears to be involved in some capacity with a few notable things, but doesn't seem to be notable herself. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/they)Talk to Me! 18:48, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Week delete as above, she's basically a political candidate in a small, fringe party. She's gotten mentions in the press, but nothing out of the ordinary. I think if we had one or more substantial stories about her, she might pass GNG. I couldn't find any. Oaktree b (talk) 19:49, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and ThadeusOfNazereth. Not enough significant WP:RS-compliant coverage to satisfy WP:GNG. Also fails WP:NPOL and WP:10YT. Sal2100 (talk) 20:35, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: As nominator said. Contributor008 (talk) 15:42, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: As per nomination. A huge percentage of the article relies on primary sources which is never a good sign for a BLP. 64.43.158.192 (talk) 07:55, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep The article needs massive cleanup and any COI accounts engaging in disruptive actions on the article need to be blocked, but AFD is not cleanup and I think there is barely enough to get over the GNG hump. Smartyllama (talk) 23:11, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Are there any sources you think are particularly good? I think the vast majority are unusable as spokesperson comments, but it's possible I missed something for sure - There's a lot there. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)Talk to Me! 17:55, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
 * seems to be pretty significant, and when combined with the others, I think it's barely enough to get over GNG. That being said, the article needs a lot of work. Smartyllama (talk) 21:21, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
 * That does seem to be significant. I still think I lean delete only because it's a local profile - If it were national it'd be enough for me. The tide might shift though! ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)Talk to Me! 23:59, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Westword is a local-based alternative news publication, not a RS, so it wouldn't seem to apply towards establishing notability.174.206.42.214 (talk) 14:34, 17 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.