Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caryn Groedel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Kick off Survivor. --Luigi30 (Ta&lambda;k) 17:20, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Caryn Groedel

 * – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Previously survived as a bundled nomination of various survivor contestants over 5 months ago which ended as a no consensus-train wreck. Some of them has since been renominated on individual cases, and some has been deleted on the consensus that they were not notable outside the the game show.  (e.g,  &)

I will re-nominate this NN Survivor contestant who hasnt done anything since leaving the show. Lack of notable secondary references outside game show, A quick google search (minus Wikipedia results) turns up around 1,000 results but most are forum posts from the Survivor game show, plus a few on her official website. I'm sure we dont create pages on losing game show contestants on shows such as Jeopardy or Deal or No Deal because they've been on a game show. (well except for the obvious notable celebrities on the special editions). --Arnzy (talk • contribs) 13:33, 26 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete - no evidence of notability per WP:BIO; other than the biography on Jewish Women International, no coverage in third-party sources is cited to establish notability. Being on a reality show doesn't inherently confer notability. Delete unless more sources are added by the end of this AfD. Wal  ton  Vivat Regina!  16:24, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete a bio that is rather unnoticed and a reality show contestants (is any of them going to remembered in two years anyway ?) and hardly any hard sources, with a living person it leaves no choice Alf photoman 17:59, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete losing a reality show is not notable in itself and te article makes no other claim to notability. Nuttah68 10:32, 1 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.