Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Case-Mate


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (Non-administrator closure) Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 01:30, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Case-Mate
"Withdrawn by nominator"

I have reverted the present Case-Mate to one of the earlier revisions that made sense. Thank you for those who have participated in the discussionCheers!--  Allied Rangoon‧talk   01:27, 14 September 2014 (UTC)


 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article is written for a advertisement. It is not allowed, I have acknowledged the Wikipedia standards for deletion. Cheers!--  Allied Rangoon‧talk   19:02, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

'''ANYONE MAY JOIN THE DISCUSSION, NO MULTIPLE ACCOUNTS TO REINFORCE YOUR OPINION. PLEASE LET ME KNOW YOU'VE PLACED AN OPINION ON MY talk page.'''


 * Rules:

You may not delete or undo any other user's opinion. I will personally delete those that are vandalism.

No multiple accounts as I have mentioned.

You may not change someone other user's opinions.

Be respectful and reasonable.

Thank you.Cheers!--  Allied Rangoon‧talk   21:43, 13 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment There's nothing in the article; an SPA blanked it before you took it to AfD. I suggest reverting to the reversion as of 13 September, 18:52, before the article was defaced. Altamel (talk) 22:40, 13 September 2014 (UTC)


 * @Altamel Thanks for the suggestion. I'll try to execute it.Cheers!--  Allied Rangoon‧talk   23:46, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.