Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CaseMap


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  ·Add§hore·  T alk T o M e ! 20:39, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

CaseMap

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems more like an advert with only primary sources. Tagged for notability for 5 years. Boleyn (talk) 20:19, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep, was easily able to find a good deal of secondary sources in books, including a book with this subject as its title itself of the book, and other books as well. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 18:13, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 23:19, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 23:19, 14 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. —Locke Cole • t • c 19:50, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Comment Thank you for looking into it. The article doesn't currently have reliable sources. If you have found some, could you please add them to the article? Thanks. Boleyn (talk) 21:34, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Books about CaseMap:, , Books covering CaseMap: , , , , and a Journal article: . And that's just from the first few pages of a Google Books search. --Michig (talk) 19:36, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.