Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Case bidding


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 11:59, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Case bidding

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article fails NOT and Coatrack. Article was created by an WP:SPA account with no other edits other than adding links to bidsfromlawyers.com, and seems to be created only for the purpose of adding said link(which have been removed). Also created Case bidding services, another un-encyclopedic article. Has a few remaining links but they seem to vague, incidental and generaly unrelated to establishing notability. Hu12 (talk) 18:36, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Case bidding is one way to find a lawyer, described by the American Bar Association in one brief paragraph here. There appears to be nothing significant to say about the subject, but the article (essentially a dictionary definition) would serve only as a coatrack to attract the promoters of such websites who will insert references to inconsequential information that link to a commercial service. Topic has no encyclopedic value. Johnuniq (talk) 23:28, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom, there is no substantive coverage on this subject and is a coatrack for spam.  Triplestop  x3  02:14, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep article without references to any commercial services - this attorney/client connection service is recognized by the ABA and the Law Journal of the Univ. of Texas. A $2.8 billion industry is not insignificant.  This is a relatively new concept, so additional details will be forthcoming.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by YesIamalawyer (talk • contribs) 08:45, 17 November 2009 (UTC)  — YesIamalawyer (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep - Article does not fail NOT test because a process is described along with ethical considerations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Goldcap44 (talk • contribs) 13:56, 18 November 2009 (UTC)  — Goldcap44 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.