Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casey James (third nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. —Doug Bell talk 10:58, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Casey James

 * — (View AfD)

NN person, I don't see how it lives up to WP:PORNBIO. I know it went through 2 other AFDs but the first I believe was breaking WP:POINT and the second was no consensus. Also, now that we have a new guideline, I feel this deserves to be revisited. Dismas|(talk) 05:59, 6 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment: For ease of reference by others, the first AfD is archived here and the second is here. Tabercil 06:12, 6 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. Clearly doesn't meet WP:PORNBIO or WP:BIO. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud 09:27, 6 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment: checking before I run off and try and find / verify a few things, but I believe she qualifies under Criteria 6 for notability within Genre and also wondering if for genre oriented discussions, would the "playmate of the month" rule apply (Criteria 2)if they were of a similar title in a genre oriented magazine as opposed to strictly mainstream like Playboy / Penthouse? (ie. Hustler's Busty Beauties, Gent, Score, etc in this persons case)Charlam 00 15:33, 6 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Doesn't come close to satisying any BIO notability guidelines. Valrith 16:54, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Charlam's comments and I don't see any reason to change the outcomes of the first 2 AfDs. --Oakshade 19:02, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Sharkface217 05:14, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per porn --61.114.193.19 12:35, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete fails pornbio, just another retired former cam whore.  ALKIVAR &trade; &#x2622; 20:17, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.