Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casey Johnson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Woody Johnson. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:09, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Casey Johnson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This dead person has no actual personal notability at all which would meet Wikipedia guidelines, other than being a rich heiress who died. Having diabetes, being rich, appearing in minor roles, and having a family fight do not rise to anything more than "celebrity gossip" and, in this case, the deceased was not a celebrity. In addition the name of a minor adopted child is repeatedly bandied in the excuse of a BDP. Note that "fake cites" had been found in this article in the past, which makes one reasonably doubt the notability of the dead person, unless we start listing all dead relatives of marginally notable people as though their notability were inherited. Collect (talk) 14:04, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:30, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:30, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:30, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:31, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:31, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:31, 27 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Woody Johnson, where the subject's life is described in an easily-read paragraph without any tabloid issues within her father's article.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 07:47, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete unless there is something else that is waiting to be added, I'm not seeing enough to pass notability. The lede sums it up... "an American heiress, socialite, and celebutante as well as an occasional actress, model, and author. She was the great-great-granddaughter of Robert Wood Johnson I, co-founder of Johnson & Johnson." Being the great-great anything of someone wealthy and notable isn't enough. A brief mention on the personal life area of her father might be warranted.Sgerbic (talk) 19:59, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Woody Johnson - there is some stuff that does belong in Woody's article, such as the diabetes book. The association with celebrity Tila Tequila, I'm not so fond of. Ritchie333 (talk)  (cont)  22:02, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable subject of tabloid coverage.John Pack Lambert (talk) 07:57, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't think the New York Times is a tabloid. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  16:14, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: delete or redirect/merge

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  So Why  10:53, 4 September 2017 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jax 0677 (talk) 17:19, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete and "Redirect" name only to Woody Johnson. The article is full of trivia (some of which is unsourced or poorly sourced) and not suitable for a bio of a recently deceased person. There's no stand-alone notability and no need to preserve article history. A "Merge" would not be appropriate either as per my comment above. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:19, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable, per nom. A redirect, without content merge, per K.e.coffman, would be ok. Ifnord (talk) 21:10, 19 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.