Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casey Kubara


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:06, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Casey Kubara

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 17:35, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:36, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:36, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:36, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – XboxGamer 22408 talk 02:01, 12 June 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak delete: Player has gotten some decent, albeit WP:ROUTINE, coverage such as this write up from USA Hockey (which is more of "Weekly Update" type article), this coverage from the local Canberra Times about him and his brothers, and this brief blurb from ABC News in Australia. However, none of those are significant coverage, secondary, and independent (the first could be considered primary and possibly unreliable as it is blog-ish, the second does not appear to be independent as it is local, and the third does not have much in significant coverage). WP:TOOSOON for NHOCKEY requirements. Yosemiter (talk) 22:09, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  So Why  07:00, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as there is not enough independent coverage to warrant an article here. Deadman137 (talk) 04:10, 23 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.