Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cash surplus value added


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sidenote: the article has been renamed to Cash value added. (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000(talk) 16:05, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Cash surplus value added

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Searches found only uses of the term, and nothing that could possibly flesh this out beyond a dicdef. The fact that this has been untouched since 2006 is inexcusable. No good sources found, WP:WINAD failure. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:04, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:29, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:29, 11 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep The concept seems better known as Cash Value Added and there are numerous sources for this such as Performance Measures in Value Management. What's inexcusable here is the failure to follow our deletion process.  AFD is not cleanup. Warden (talk) 14:01, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment Ten Pound Hammer's only fault seems to be in nominating the article that was visible instead of fixing the article that should have been there instead, but how can he/she be expected to do otherwise? I cannot blame the nominator for a lack of clairvoyance in determining what the original editor was actually thinking.  That others were able to figure it out speaks to their credit, not to TPH's detriment.  --Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:23, 24 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:32, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

 
 * move to cash value added and expand Searching shows that "cash value added" is the normal term (see the seminal paper and this comparison with other methods). I'm inclined to leave no redirect given that we seem to be the promulgator of the far less usual version of the term. Mangoe (talk) 15:01, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:29, 25 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep and rename. Clearly Cash Value Added is notable, and this seems to be a synonym. Wikipedia ought to cover the term. There is a need for the article to be harmonised with others especially those on Economic Value Added, Added Value and Value added, inclusion in Value-added (disambiguation) and some discussion of when one measure might be used rather than another, but those are editing matters. --AJHingston (talk) 11:09, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
 * I have made the move to cash value added to help in further source-searching and discussion. Warden (talk) 12:58, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.