Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cashmere Agency


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 20:33, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Cashmere Agency

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable company, page appears to be spam Jezhotwells (talk) 00:49, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 
 * Delete Spam by a COI editor, see their talk page Lets  drink  Tea  02:03, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Yet another non-notable PR/marketing company trying to use Wikipedia to promote themselves. Nick-D (talk) 07:04, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. It obviously needs some editing to get rid of less than stellar language, but so far everyone has ignored the references. One is a passing mention to establish a fact, one is not dependent. The rest appears to be fully reliable and meeting WP:GNG. Also, articles shouldn't be deleted based on who created them. They should be judged on their own merit or lack thereof. - Mgm|(talk) 13:51, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:03, 3 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. To the extent that this non-consumer publicity business has been mentioned in reliable sources, all of them stem from its relationship with the pop star Snoop Dogg, without which they would have received no mainstream attention.  And notability is not inherited.  At least, a publicity firm needs more going for it than a relationship with a pop star to overcome the odor of spam caused by conflict of interest. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:15, 3 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.