Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casio BE-300


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. JohnCD (talk) 18:21, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Casio BE-300

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No references or indication of notability. A very large portion of the article consists of fansite-like material and instructions. BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 17:33, 8 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep - Widely released consumer electronics almost always meet notability guidelines. It does need some pretty massive clean up though.--Yasth (talk) 17:43, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:11, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  21:00, 15 January 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:48, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - per the lots of passing mentions I find. Products distinctly and widely released are notable per the long term consensus.— UY Scuti Talk  16:53, 29 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.