Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casio DW-5600E


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to G-Shock. (non-admin closure) — UY Scuti Talk  16:34, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Casio DW-5600E

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Essentially a list of specifications, only references the user guide and no indication of notability. BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 16:44, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:07, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:07, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   07:07, 20 January 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Suggest merge with G-Shock. Biscuittin (talk) 20:09, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:01, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * merge as suggested. Same for all the G-shock watches. An article on the range makes sense, but models can just be sections within this. It would show the range history much better too. 108.171.128.174 (talk) 15:11, 27 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment: I think the G-Shock article should not have a section for each model, because they are only notable as collectors items. BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 15:54, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment a merge to G-Shock or a new list article of notable models (if at all possible to write) would be best. Widefox ; talk 02:15, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge as suggested  DGG ( talk ) 06:49, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge anything that is necessary, as mentioned. SwisterTwister   talk  06:55, 3 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.