Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casio DW-6100


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to G-Shock. (non-admin closure)  Ya  sh  !   10:54, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Casio DW-6100

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced, no indication of notability. BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 16:26, 11 February 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to Casio. The watch exists, but is completely non-notable. edtiorEهեইдအီးËეεઈדוארई電子ಇអ៊ី전자ഇī😎 00:56, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:06, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:53, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:53, 18 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete/Redirect to G-Shock, which probably should be renamed to Casio G-Shock, but that's another topic. --OpenFuture (talk) 11:11, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to G-Shock. Fairly unnotable and maybe even a bit obscure. --Mr. Magoo (talk) 19:16, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to G-Shock. North America1000 07:40, 25 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.