Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casio G-Shock Rangeman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 02:16, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Casio G-Shock Rangeman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability, reads somewhat like an advertisement or product page. BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 15:46, 5 January 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, sst  ✈  04:05, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  04:07, 12 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - Page is far too promotional and only uses self-published sources. Meatsgains (talk) 04:18, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:22, 12 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - Unlikely better notable item. SwisterTwister   talk  07:53, 12 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.