Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casio Kingdom


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)   17:02, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Casio Kingdom
Advertisement for non-notable website that makes no assertion of notability per WP:WEB. Successfully prodded, but re-created. Does not qualify for CSD G4. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 05:37, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Leuko 05:39, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, no evidence that this site meets WP:WEB. Article also appears to have been created by an author whose username is the same as that of the creator of the site, which makes it WP:VANITY as well. -- Kinu t /c  05:43, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * KEEP Casio Kingdom hosts all of my games/programs which I personally created. It's also listed on Casio Education Australia. It's part of the history of calculator gaming.Seantan 05:47, 26 August 2006 (UTC) -- article's creator Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 05:50, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Please take a note at our notability guidelines for websites which discuss which websites are notable enough to deserve a Wikipedia article. Has this website been given previous coverage by reliable sources, e.g. widely published newspaper or magazine? Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 05:50, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * No it hasn't been, but I thought being on a Casio Education website would give it some credit. Also, regarding the Vanity claim, my article is purely informative. It doesn't give any praise to my site at all.Seantan 05:58, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * You made an article with the aim of giving your site publicity - which is the intent of a vanity article. We'd prefer website owners not to write about their own sites at all. If it's that interesting, someone else will write an article about it. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 06:13, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --AbsolutDan (talk) 05:54, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Nuttah68 14:28, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions.   -- Jap9c 22:10, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Mitaphane talk 23:10, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Seantan, I think your efforts would be better spent improving the article for the Casio CFX-9850GB PLUS rather than self promotion. For example, a section on programming could be added(this is obviously something you know about), or the addition of your website link in Casio CFX-9850GB PLUS's external links section. The TI-89 has a small community around programming for the calculator, the same seems to be the case for the CFX-9850. Mitaphane talk 23:10, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks Mitaphane. I will do so. I would still like to keep my article though 202.89.180.222 04:51, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Your article? Please see WP:OWN Leuko 05:56, 27 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Haha, you know what I mean.Seantan 06:56, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   -- Longhair 01:31, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. JPD (talk) 11:47, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete self-promotional. -- Armadillo From Hell  04:56, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Del33t--ZayZayEM 10:13, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Roisterer 15:10, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.