Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casio electronic dictionaries


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat  04:34, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Casio electronic dictionaries

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

''Wikipedia is not a directory of everything that exists or has existed. Wikipedia articles are not lists or repositories of loosely associated topics. WP:NOT Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of items of information. That something is 100% true does not automatically mean it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia.'' WP:NOT Masterpedia 02:59, 31 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per my nomination. --Masterpedia 03:01, 31 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment I didn't realise you could opt to vote on something you had nominated, Masterpedia, but still I agree with it, so Delete. Thor Malmjursson 03:12, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I dont see why not. Here is a similar example from RFA, the nominator is supporting his own nomination.--Masterpedia 15:20, 31 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Covered in Electronic dictionary; a list of model numbers adds nothing.  &mdash;Cel  ithemis  03:17, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. This looks like a list for the sake of a list. The article doesn't assert any notion why these series of electronic dictionaries are important.  Mitaphane  ? 03:20, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Listcruft. Realkyhick 05:30, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Celithemis. Poeloq 08:57, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment It is a poorly written article but if there were more context I could vote to keep. --Infrangible 01:46, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.