Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casket of Souls


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to The Nightrunner Series. The article is currently an announcement for a product yet-to-be-released - see WP:CRYSTAL, particularly point 5, for why that's not fit for a Wikipedia article. Also, the only sources are the author's blog and website - also shaky. Let's leave it as a redirect until the book is actually out. m.o.p 13:56, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Casket of Souls

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article about a non-published book. Looks like an advertisement. Not notable. Night of the Big Wind (talk) 20:19, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 20:52, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Delete --per above. Additionally, the majority of the text of the article seems to be a direct quote of the book's summary on Amazon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bstbll (talk • contribs) 20:58, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Strong keep. It's the latest book in a notable series by a notable author and published by a notable publisher. Trim out the promotional bit, yes, but keep the rest of the article (which won't actually be able to have any more content for another several months). DS (talk) 15:27, 13 June 2011 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

 Redirect at least for now to The Nightrunner Series. The title is probably useful as a search term, but the time for deciding whether the book should have its own article will be once it is published. PWilkinson (talk) 22:25, 24 June 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.