Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casper Crowell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 05:37, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Casper Crowell

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

BLP1E  Article fails to show notabilty, except for the fact that he's in jail and a white supremist. Delete recommended. Kosh Vorlon  16:10, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:39, 18 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect This explains why he is perhaps notable, and should be added to the article. This racist is actually running and recruiting for a weird white-supremacy "holy" order - from his cell in a maximum security prison. Redirecting to  an appropriate target article on the grounds that a wikipedia page is flattering to this troglodyte, and may even help him attract followers.E.M.Gregory (talk) 00:41, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:48, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paganism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:48, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:48, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:48, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete The SPLC is the antithesis of a reliable source for anything, and its use to support that anyone is notable I will question long and hard. The SPLC engages in attempts to smear their political opponants by connecting them to extremists that they do not at all support. It's methods are inflamatory and have been a key cause is some killings, so there is no reason to use it as a source for anything, especially the claim that someone serving life in prison is running a network that matters at all.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:03, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note There is coverage. National Geographic : .E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:44, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e talk 12:26, 25 May 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vipinhari  &#124;&#124;  talk  15:56, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Tough call. One one hand, I strongly disagree that we should delete simply to "no platform" him, no matter how despicable he is. At the same time, I found very little in the way of quality sourcing. Ultimately, I'm leaning towards a Weak Delete, since the coverage is not terribly strong. Even the SPLC source says little about him besides that he does recruiting, fundraising, web activity, etc. GABgab 18:38, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as there's still by far nothing at all to suggest how he's independently notable as a separate article, nothing convincing at all. SwisterTwister   talk  06:49, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable. Tom29739 [ talk ] 00:40, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Subject is not independently notable --Cameron11598 (Talk) 02:19, 12 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.