Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cass V. Cibelli

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep because of ongoing copyvio investigation and lack of valid votes in this discussion. The only vote that I see here that I can count is Capitalistroadster's.

If not for the copyvio, I would have extended discussion. If it survives WP:CP, I will probably relist. Somebody remind me should I forget. --Tony Sidaway Talk 22:23, 16 August 2005 (UTC)

Cass_V._Cibelli
vanity, definite copyvio, not notable (win the election first) 128.112.24.137 03:42, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment. Page listed on Copyright problems as copyvio from . --Alan Au 04:47, 5 August 2005 (UTC)

speedy keep, high-profile race in Westchester. Voters have a right to find out information about the candidates. This makes it easier for them to do so.


 * Above unsigned comment is by the same person who created the article . 128.112.24.137 04:55, 5 August 2005 (UTC)

speedy keep, I wrote the biography, posted it on the website and hold the exclusive right to use it. There is no copyright violation here. By posting the biography on this page I authorized it's use on this page.


 * Hi, 68.161.66.112 (again.) First of all, there is no such thing as "speedy keep." Secondly, please sign your remarks by putting 4 ~s afterwards. Thirdly, you claim that this is a "high-profile race" in Westchester. The only mention of "Cass Cibelli" that I could find in the news was a two sentence, second-paragraph mention in an online-only newspaper . Finally, if you are the person who wrote the promotional biography on Cibelli's website, then it is inappropriate for you to copy and paste this to create the page on Wikipedia. (The content you posted, whether you own it or not, is not "neutral" ("NPOV" in the parlance.) It is inappropriate for an encyclopedia article. If the article is not deleted, that content will be, by me or someone else.) 128.112.24.137 05:41, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep is a common vote on VfD. It is essentially equivalent to voting to de-list, because the nomination is brazenly inappropriate.  -- Visviva 12:01, 7 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. Copyvio on non-notable candidate. A search for that name achieved nil results on Google News or Topix.net  suggesting he is not that high profile in terms of newsworthiness. BTW, the VfD notice was missing but I restored it. Capitalistroadster 06:14, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: We already have a process for resolving copyvio.  VfD is not it.
 * Comment. The argument for VfD is that the person is not-notable. There is an additional copyvio issue, which in part arises from the fact that the subject is sufficiently non-notable that there is no other source of information on him. Sdedeo 23:34, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.