Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cassandra Latham

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep. Joyous 02:19, Jan 21, 2005 (UTC)

Cassandra Latham
Unnotable vanity. -- 81.152.170.19 00:33, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Bizarre but notable if it's true. Or, maybe not. (I wonder who the first person to put down "Jedi" was - don't you?) Actually, it might not be notable who's the first, but just how many people do it. LockeShocke 00:37, Jan 5, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. As LockeShocke says, it's notable. And it's not vanity unless Cassandra was the author. Bryan 02:05, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, it's helpful. Wyss 02:25, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep, borderline notability Megan1967 03:58, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak keep: Quite a few Google hits. DCEdwards1966 04:14, Jan 5, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Obviously notable. --Centauri 04:17, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. There are enough google hits to convince me it's real (at least for small values of real).  It's certainly intriguing, and I don't see any obvious proof that it's vanity.  Falls somewhere between "Earth-shattering importance" and "mindless trivia". RoySmith 04:25, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep -- Jmabel | Talk 06:46, Jan 5, 2005 (UTC)
 * As the author of the article in question I obviously have a bias and am going to say keep. As an acquaintance of Cassandra herself I can vouch for the fact that she is (still) the only witch in the UK who relies on her craft as her sole source of income and that she was the first witch in the UK to register her profession with the inland revenue; I can think of at least two others who have since followed suit.  Whether as an acquaintance of Cassandra's, writing an article about her is considered vanity is up for debate; I wrote it in a rare mad moment. -- Francs2000 | Talk  11:26, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * weak keep ~ mlk &#9993; &#9836; 05:21, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC) ~
 * Keep. Interesting. --JuntungWu 06:26, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge into witchcraft or similar article. &rarr;Reene&#9998; 06:07, Jan 14, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.