Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cassidy Banks (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:14, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Cassidy Banks
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Porn star article was previously deleted with false claims of notability. It's back, this time with bogus citations for all the substantial content. This could be a G4, except it contains new falsehoods. Again no verifiable claim of notability. • Gene93k (talk) 22:08, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:10, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:11, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:11, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:11, 21 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep - Few sources on Google News, Not amazing but notability is certainly there, I'd imagine there's more elsewhere. – Davey 2010 Talk 02:56, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Most of the GNews hits in your link are pictorials or passing mentions. One non-trivial hit appears to be a blog.  Leaving one article in an online magazine of unknown quality. • Gene93k (talk) 03:45, 22 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails the gng as stands and the sourcing proposed by Davey isn't enough to cut the mustard. The amount of self-promotion going on here makes me view claims of notability through a stricter eye than normal. Spartaz Humbug! 06:23, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -insufficient indicia of notability. .  Montanabw (talk) 02:54, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. No real assertion of notability. No independent reliable sourcing; all the non-database references appear to be spurious. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006.   (talk) 13:01, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. K.e.coffman (talk) 15:45, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-notable pornographic actress. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   17:23, 28 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.