Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cassie's second studio album (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep, this article was up for AfD very recently. There have also been several sources added confirming album release. GlassCobra 23:43, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Cassie's second studio album (2nd nomination)
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

An album that has no title, no official tracklisting and is not very notable. Similar articles that have been deleted are: - The Return (Cassie album), which has been deleted six times and - Still Cassie, which has been deleted three times. I think that it should be created again in the near future. Surfer-Boy94  (Talk) March 18 10:34 (UTC)
 * Comment A big difference is that this article is based on a Billboard magazine article devoted solely to the album. Also, there is no speculation (other than the assumption that the album will be released). Note that this article was recently AfD'd as Connecticut Fever and passed (AfD closed March 6); it's a little soon to try again, don'tcha think? I'll refrain from !voting as I usually prefer more coverage but this is too close for me to call. — Hello, Control Hello, Tony  13:01, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:10, 18 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak merge - Unlike the previous versions, this one seems to be free of fancruft and other unsourced garbage. However, one source is a weak basis for an article. Move the content to Cassie and when/if additional reliable coverage surfaces, build the article anew. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 13:42, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.   — Hello, Control  Hello, Tony  15:48, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge for now for the exact same arguments put forth by Mdsummermsw. Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 20:42, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep! This article has been nominated a million times! If it survived every other nomination, then there must be a reason that it was kept. So I say keep.  Corn.u.co.pia'''  Discussion  05:47, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment If by "a million" you mean "four", then you are correct. But in two of the the three past nominations, it was deleted. And of the one it passed—surviving an AfD does not inoculate against future deletion. — Hello, Control  Hello, Tony  10:59, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable, good source available. Everyking (talk) 17:03, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep: The article states a title now. George D. Watson  (Dendodge). Talk Help 09:03, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment That is the old unsourced title and has been reverted. — Hello, Control Hello, Tony  09:14, 24 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.