Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cassiline Brotherhood


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 09:35, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Cassiline Brotherhood

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Consists only of extensive content summary from a series of novels, contrary to WP:PLOT and WP:WAF. This aspect of the series has no third-party coverage in reliable sources that is substantial enough, per WP:GNG, to be the basis of an article. If deemed necessary, the content can be briefly summarized in the article about the series, Kushiel's Legacy. Otherwise it is best presented in the Wikia wiki dedicated to the series, which appears comprehensive enough to assume that this content, or its equivalent, is already present there.  Sandstein  08:25, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 09:24, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 19:42, 12 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete: As with other Kushiel's Legacy-related articles, this one is an unreferenced content fork and an unnecessary split that does not meet the general notability guideline as a stand-alone topic and which content can only be a summary-only description of a fictional work, so I do not see a valid reason to keep the article. Jfgslo (talk) 00:25, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - TP 00:36, 18 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:GNG. LibStar (talk) 00:36, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete unreferenced content fork that does not meet the general notability guideline. Shooterwalker (talk) 01:13, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.