Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cassius Taylor (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was redirect to Lady Helen Taylor. Jaranda wat's sup 19:01, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Cassius Taylor
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Was nominated about a year ago for AfD here and the result was no consensus. No external links/google searches for establishing notability or being involved in any major events (simply being 'nth' in line should not qualify for WP:BIO). Eliz81 20:30, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. 28th in line to succession isn't even close to notable. No other claims either. Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 20:34, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per lack of notability. Maybe a page should be created that shows the line of succession to the throne, instead of articles for each person.  Corpx 20:38, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - The article certainly fails WP:BIO. Corpx has also raised an interesting issue. What should be done with the other 100+ articles about the so and so in line to the throne. -- Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor  ( ταlκ )  20:52, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, but redirect to Lady Helen Taylor. I don't think any of the Taylor kids listed there are notable (one is aged two). Similar merges or redirects are appropriate for many -- a dozen or more, certainly -- in Line of succession to the British Throne. --Dhartung | Talk 21:34, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect to Lady Helen Taylor. I think direct descendants of the current and previous sovereign are enough. -- Charlene 21:39, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep or Merge, sorry guys but Nobility and Royalty should be placed in wikipedia. I am indifferent if he has his own page or merged with his mother. Callelinea 23:14, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge Not notable enough on own, but as he's on the list, a redirect to Lady Helen Taylor and make sure her kids are listed in the article. --Rocksanddirt 23:17, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * merge as in other borderline situations, articles for the family are the way to go. Personally, I'd give him an article but I'd much rather compromise on cases like this than argue each of them.DGG (talk) 03:53, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 15:31, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep as British Nobility and Royalty ought to be in English Wikipedia. Bearian 23:39, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BIO, I don't think he's notable, even if he is (just barely) notable, per WP:BLP1E since he's only notable for one thing – his place on the line of succession to the British crown – we cover the thing not the person, so redirect to Line of succession to the British Throne. Carlossuarez46 01:43, 16 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.