Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Castelo de Marvão


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Castle of Marvão. WP:SNOW since it's already been done and was unopposed. (non-admin closure) clpo13(talk) 19:14, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Castelo de Marvão

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There is a much more detailed and in depth page at Castle of Marvão Winterysteppe (talk) 13:44, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Castle of Marvão. Seems a logical search term and uncontroversial action. Mabalu (talk) 13:47, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  14:12, 11 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Castle of Marvão, it remains a very useful search term, but note that this article was created long before Castle of Marvão and should be preserved for attribution purposes, if nothing else. The proper procedure, although probably too late now, would have been to move this one to the English title, and then add the new article content or to add the content and then move it—not to create a competing article under a new title. Voceditenore (talk) 14:21, 11 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Castle of Marvão per all above.4meter4 (talk) 14:28, 11 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Note The article has now been redirected to Castle of Marvão by 4meter4 Dr. Blofeld, making this discussion moot. I think that was probably an appropriately unbureaucratic solution, but in that case, the nomination should be withdrawn. If not, then the redirect should be reverted until this AfD is closed. Also, Winterysteppe, I have provided the attribution template at Talk:Castle of Marvão stating that the article is a translation from the Portuguese Wikipedia. This is required by Wikipedia's terms of use and licensing. Please see Copying within Wikipedia for future guidance. Voceditenore (talk) 15:08, 11 March 2016 (UTC) updated by Voceditenore (talk) 07:56, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Um... I believe User:Dr. Blofeld redirected the article. Not me. :-)4meter4 (talk) 15:22, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Oops! Sorry, 4meter4 :) Voceditenore (talk) 15:25, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I did, as it's basic common sense to redirect a duplicate article under a Portuguese title to an English one. It shouldn't have been taken to AFD!♦ Dr. Blofeld  15:27, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:50, 11 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.