Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caster Concepts


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  14:31, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Caster Concepts

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Subject is non-notable. vghfr (✉  Talk ) (✏ Contribs ) 14:00, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Companies.  vghfr  (✉  Talk ) (✏ Contribs ) 14:00, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering and Michigan. Skynxnex (talk) 14:41, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. I see local coverage, and coverage in B2B sources which are generally promotional; neither seems sufficient for notability.— Moriwen (talk) 16:41, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with :Moriwen's analysis and the original deltion rationale.&#45;- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:49, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: I found relatively a good number of sources that this article meets WP: NCORP including this JSTOR article: MAGNUSON, S. (2021). UP FRONT. National Defense, 105(806), 6–7. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27023231. Local news doesn't necessarily means it's not reliable. They seems to be reliable. All the Best!   Otuọcha   (talk) 23:50, 17 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete I agree for the deletion of this article. User:SYNTHWAVER MAN — Preceding undated comment added 22:52, 21 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.