Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casterton News


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete votes. (non-admin closure) • Gene93k (talk) 18:05, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Casterton News

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

non-notable small circulation newspaper per WP:NNEWSPAPER Deunanknute (talk) 04:30, 12 February 2015 (UTC) withdraw Deunanknute (talk) 17:47, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
 * This was created during a training workshop: GLAM/Australian libraries and WP/Events/2015 ALIA Workshops, and is a continuation of GLAM/State Library of New South Wales/The Newspaper Project. --99of9 (talk) 06:46, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep NNEWSPAPER is an essay, and not a guideline. A newspaper in publication since 1869 seems likely to be notable, even if only local.  If we're going to use essays, one could reference WP:NME under criteria 3, as it would be considered a reliable, authoritative source for topics related to Casterton, Victoria.    78.26   (spin me / revolutions) 15:23, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep. Obviously notable topic, nicely done article. -- do ncr  am  15:24, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per 99of9. bd2412  T 16:29, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.