Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Castle Game Engine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ~Swarm~ {sting} 00:11, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Castle Game Engine

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails notability criterion WP:GNG, and subject-specific criteria not found to apply. Virtually all the sources are self-published, leaving little independent coverage on which to base a claim of notability. ☆ Bri (talk) 22:31, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 22:56, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 03:42, 29 September 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Article has been Proded so is not eligible for soft delete.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 02:35, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, article is written in a promotional style, with lines like "The engine is known for..." and does not give any mention of drawbacks. Jeb3  Talk at me here  18:47, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
 * The promotional style could be fixed, I believe. E.g. the unfortunate sentence """The engine is known for its versatility, supporting...""" could be just changed to a simpler sentence """The engine supports...". As for the drawbacks, I am not sure what should be added -- the drawbacks are missing features compared to others, e.g. support for more platforms (like XBox) or languages (like C#). I don't think Unity (game engine) or OGRE explicitly list any drawbacks of the respective engines either. (P.S. I think that this is not related to the notability concern.) MichalisKamburelis (talk) 07:21, 9 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.