Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Castnia juturna


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. A discussion about an article page move can occur on the article talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 22:53, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Castnia juturna

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I couldn't find sufficient reliable sources to show this meets WP:N. Has been unreferenced for many years. Boleyn (talk) 21:46, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:52, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Paraguay-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:52, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal and Biology. Skynxnex (talk) 21:55, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: sources such as, and  suggest this meets WP:NSPECIES. Owen&times;  &#9742;  23:06, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: Per . It's a recognized species. I'm not sure it's right, but that's how we've handled species in the past. SchreiberBike &#124; ⌨ 00:28, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Move - needs attention but not for the reasons stated (obviously a validly described taxon). This species appears to have been reclassified into the genus Elina, hence should be moved to Elina juturna and a redirect established at current location. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 08:25, 4 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.