Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Castration Celebration


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (Well there is consensus to merge, but where though?) Secret account 23:28, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Castration Celebration

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails Notability (books) on all counts. Just a plot summary, no sources.GrapedApe (talk) 11:44, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:17, 19 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge I found 2 reviews, added to article, but I don't think that's enough for notability (edited to add: plus there's a Booklist review that's subscribers-only and a review from Common Sense Media which may not count). However I think the author Jake Wizner may be notable through Spanking Shakespeare which did receive more press, and Wizner himself got a profile in Publishers Weekly plus there's some Variety articles that are currently offline and a couple of pay-to-view articles I've not read - Booklist and Vail Daily. So I would suggest either creating a Jake Wizner article and merging this there, or merging it with Spanking Shakespeare and renaming the combined article to Jake Wizner. I don't mind doing the work if people decide either of these are the best option. --Colapeninsula (talk) 16:39, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Support a merge per Colapeninsula though am not convinced we need to kill the Spanking Shakespeare, Sadads (talk) 17:50, 19 March 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.