Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cat's Eye (movie photobook)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to Cat's Eye (1997 film). Since this was already done I have redirected there. Kevin (talk) 06:15, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Cat's Eye (movie photobook)

 * – (View AfD)

Notability concerns - lack of significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. PhilKnight (talk) 13:26, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge anything useful with Cat's Eye (1997 film) and redirect.  D C E dwards 1966  15:23, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions.   —Dekkappai (talk) 18:12, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge as per DCEdwards1966 Ron B. Thomson (talk) 20:33, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge These AfDs were set up oddly... It appears that the entire Category:Japanese female models photobooks has been nominated individually, rather than bundling them into one. Also, User:Wikivalu the creator of the category and the articles was not notified, so I notified the editor. In regards to the AfDs: Articles for deletion/Cat's Eye (movie photobook), Articles for deletion/Visual queen of the year '93, Articles for deletion/YUKISS, Articles for deletion/Yorusora ni YOUKISS!, Articles for deletion/Yuki to tsuki to taiyo to: I see no coverage, reviewing, sourcing, or any other evidence of notability. The editor, in creating these articles, appears to have wanted to illustrate photobooks in which Yuki Uchida appears. No other information which cannot be supplied at the main article is given. So, merge this article to the film, and the rest of these articles (if there is any information to merge) into Yuki Uchida. Dekkappai (talk) 22:08, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to Cat's Eye (1997 film). don't need a separate page for two sentences. -- Gman 124 talk 04:50, 3 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.