Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cat Aficionado Association (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 12:00, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Cat Aficionado Association
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

Never met WP:SIGCOV standards. There is only a single source "The Mythology of Cats" that even references it more than trivially. Elephanthunter (talk) 17:57, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Elephanthunter (talk) 17:57, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Elephanthunter (talk) 17:57, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:11, 6 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Agree to delete it. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 07:22, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.     </li> <li></li> <li></li> <li> The passing mention notes: "This is especially obvious at the recent 5th Shanghai Pet Fair in early March, where over 20 pure-breed cats were the highlight at the World Cat Pageant organized by the Cat Aficionado Association (CAA), China's largest cats registry."</li> </ol>There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Cat Aficionado Association to pass Notability, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Cunard (talk) 09:54, 7 August 2021 (UTC) </li></ul>
 * Thank you for taking the time to find these sources. Although not a requirement, it would be nice if the article was updated to include some of these sources so for readers it would be verifiably notable, and it doesn't inadvertently get nominated for deletion again at some point in the future. The logo may be on the verge of deletion (see discussion) due to the inability to verify its origin. Does the CAA have a website or other materials that could be used to source an accurate logo? --Elephanthunter (talk) 19:57, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I added the sources to the article. I cannot find a website for the Cat Aficionado Association and cannot find anything to verify that File:CAA international logo for distribution.jpg was created by the Cat Aficionado Association, so I agree with the current consensus that the image is unverified. Cunard (talk) 04:44, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:22, 13 August 2021 (UTC) Keep - By the additional sources added. (WP:HEY) Suriname0 (talk) 14:01, 19 August 2021 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:06, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep  as per WP:HEY as the sources has been added by Cunard. Thanks VocalIndia (talk) 14:52, 21 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.