Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cat Saver


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 16:56, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Cat Saver
Keep or merge Arthur should keep i mean listen on arthur there are so many character have there own page and cat saver and piano tamer are noted should have own pages.Maoririder 19:59, 6 December 2005 (UTC) Lucky help.
 * This nomination was malformed and orphaned. I have fixed it although it appears to be a nomination by the author of the article - but a vote to keep... no vote as I am involved in trying to help this user understand policy. ESkog | Talk 20:32, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Perilously close to nonsense. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 21:43, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: For what it's worth, I don't think "delete per nom" works here since my interpretation of Maoririder's comment is that he wants the page to be kept. ESkog | Talk 04:29, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Sorry, brainfart. The subject appears to me to be sub-trivial. - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 12:34, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Abstain. Still trying to help Maoririder understand policy a little bit better; in fact, I've asked that a nanostub of his (which he self-nominated for deletion as well) be allowed to stay until I can get some biographical info on the subject. - Lucky 6.9 23:16, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, seems a bit sub-trivial. Stifle 14:12, 8 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.