Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catacombs 2: Party Time (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  01:12, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Catacombs 2: Party Time (film)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unsourced article on future straight-to-DVD picture. Couple of problems here: Apart from a few vague mentions on sources that are definitely not reliable, there doesn't seem to be anything verifiable about the existence of this project. IMDb listings for the actors involved, for example, don't mention the project; there are no news items and so on. Added to that the unfortunate fact that one of the producers mentioned died in 2005, and we have an article with "issues" FlowerpotmaN &middot;( t ) 16:00, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Slight update Just spotted an article, Catacombs 2: Party Time, without the (film) modification to the title, was speedied as hoax in a series of hoaxes. FlowerpotmaN &middot;( t ) 16:14, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Another slight update: Article has gone through several revisions since being listed here, so, in case anyone gets a nasty shock, the now sole producer listed is alive and well. FlowerpotmaN &middot;( t ) 21:59, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   —  FlowerpotmaN &middot;( t ) 16:34, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per lack of verifiability and crystal ball-gazing. Very likely a hoax. MuZemike 17:50, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - per above Cuñado  ☼ -  Talk  19:00, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Userfy back to author User:Sidneyandrewsmancini. There are a few things out there diff toward WP:V, so I'm willing to believe it's not a hoax. However, it needs more per WP:N. Let it be brought back in a couple months.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 08:54, 11 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.