Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catalina (actress)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:55, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Catalina (actress)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Fails WP:ENT / WP:BASIC. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:00, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:27, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:27, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:29, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:29, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:29, 9 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment. Arguably this Vice article, while silly, discusses the subject in some depth. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:33, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:52, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:53, 9 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - Actress who won only one - not so important - prize. Poor sources.Westmanurbe (talk) 17:55, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Winning the award of "Super Slut" 16 years ago is at best... cocktail party fodder. Trillfendi (talk) 22:00, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
 * DELETE Very non-notable. The vice article referenced to above speaks more to the interests of the writer (Miss Tasty, in her sole Vice contribution) than to the notability of the subject. I didn't find any references using the linked google search but as an aside, I did find numerous references to the island. ogenstein (talk) 07:29, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing particularly worth keeping here.   Montanabw (talk) 19:50, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete does not meet the general notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:16, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as no evidence of notability, fails PORNBIO & GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 19:39, 13 June 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.