Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catalina Video


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus that there was insufficient reliable sourcing that was actually about the subject. Nosebagbear (talk) 14:04, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Catalina Video

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:GNG. Störm  (talk)  10:23, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:32, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:32, 20 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. I can't find any mentions that go to notability. Bishonen &#124; talk 11:38, 20 October 2019 (UTC).
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:44, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:44, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:45, 20 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep Surely a studio that produced around 500 movies, mostly in the 1980s and 1990s including some of the most well-known titles and stars is notable and should have the entry expanded not deleted Cannonmc (talk) 23:28, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Expansion requires support from reliable sources. The article does not have them, and independent searches yield only trivial mentions, failing WP:CORPDEPTH as the nominator states. Porn films are run off in large numbers.  That's why x-number of films was taken out of WP:PORNBIO 13 years ago.  If this studio was as influential as you say, where are the independent reliable sources that attest to that? • Gene93k (talk) 01:37, 26 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete as complete WP:CORP failure. Even if you count the porn trade press as semi-reliable, their coverage consists of repackaged press releases and routine release or change of personnel announcements. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per nom and . I couldn't find one Google web search that was about this pornography producer. There were lots of videos that showed up in the results, presumably some of which were this producer's productions, but nothing that counts as WP:SIGCOV. Of the Google news search results, again, little if anything beyond passing mentions. Lots of results related to "Catalina video" or "Catalina (video)" and similar—nothing about this company. Doug Mehus (talk) 18:53, 26 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.