Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catapult international


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  01:30, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Catapult international

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

WP:SERIESA, WP:NOTYET, WP:NCORP Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 11:55, 3 June 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:30, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 11:55, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:51, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - This article is about what the company says about itself, and not what third parties say about it, and so does not establish corporate notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:32, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete This is a company therefore WP:NCORP applies. I am unable to locate any deep or significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 14:23, 10 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.