Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catapultism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 15:39, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Catapultism

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Wikipedia is not a dictionary and this word has not had widespread usage. Ryan Vesey contribs  13:58, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't find evidence of this word. Google even prompts a 'correction' when you try to search for it. Neologism at best, hoax at worst. Created by a one-time contributor incidentally. asnac (talk) 14:04, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable neologism per WP:NEO, or more likely a WP:HOAX. Wikipedia is not Urban Dictionary. Gurt Posh (talk) 14:04, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Clearly fails WP:NEO. Qrsdogg (talk) 16:13, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 02:53, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 02:53, 21 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom., others & WP:NEO.--JayJasper (talk) 00:55, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Not a real word! The word that should be used is Neologism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.27.225.37 (talk) 11:02, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.