Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cataract (Walkabouts album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to The Walkabouts.  MBisanz  talk 02:00, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Cataract (Walkabouts album)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NALBUM WP:GNG. References are just listings, not reviews. MJH (talk) 02:21, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge to The Walkabouts. The album would have received coverage in print sources when it was released, so likely passes WP:NALBUM. There is some (brief) coverage online, probably not enough to justify a standalone article at the moment: Allmusic, Trouser Press, Guia universal del rock. If anyone can find reviews from when it was released then it should be kept and expanded. --Michig (talk) 08:27, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:00, 14 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Ri l ey    00:12, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Keep. I've added a couple of more reviews. I think that the three reviews plus cites from additional RS's are sufficient. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 06:40, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:50, 22 December 2012 (UTC)




 * Merge Having examined the series of articles in this category, and although I've seen plenty of similarly stubby articles (for other bands and artists) that aren't likely ever to go anywhere, I think it may be better to have one article named 'Walkabouts discography' instead. The critical commentary can easily be integrated into it.  Ohconfucius  ping / poke 02:51, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.