Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catastrophic illness (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 20:01, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Catastrophic illness
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This page fails to meet notability criteria. Its entire content can be covered by the notable topic Disease and others within medicine. This is not a formal medical term, either.
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Just-a-can-of-beans (talk) 19:54, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. It is also an insurance term. Some insurance companies sell catastrophic illness policies, recognizing the specific financial needs of people who are struck with such an illness. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 20:41, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: I have fixed portions of this nomination that made it look like we were somehow nominating "PageName". No opinion at this time.  WC  Quidditch  ☎   ✎  22:25, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. Important technical term. - Altenmann >talk 22:55, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: the term hasn't lost its notability since the previous, unanimous Keep, AfD. Owen&times;  &#9742;  00:19, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep The article just needs expanding. It looks like it especially needs work from someone with expertise in health insurance. Deleting it would quite counterproductive. Vontheri (talk) 10:06, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: nominated again? a notable topic requiring some expansion... Password  (talk) (contribs) 01:44, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. This topic would be hard to find and probably WP:UNDUE in Disease, since it isn't relevant for disease itself so much as insurance and social services purposes. "Not a formal medical term" isn't a reason for deletion, but also, the NIH defines it: . -- asilvering (talk) 00:42, 23 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.