Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catch-99


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. TexasAndroid (talk) 18:06, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Catch-99

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable neologism - apparently mentioned in one book of fiction, no ghits. WP:NEO. Mr. Vernon (talk) 04:46, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, nn neologism. Movingboxes (talk) 05:29, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, It is now fully noted and referenced. It only appeared un-noted for a space of 3 minutes, and the reason it originally appeared to be unreferenced is I had trouble getting one of the Wiki tags to work. Cypher-neo (talk) 13:32, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment This issue isn't the references, it's the fact that it is a non-notable neologism that has apparently only been used within a single novel. Movingboxes (talk) 04:21, 29 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 13:42, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 08:53, 29 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.