Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catch and release (Congress)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman 21:33, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Catch and release (Congress)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

My impression is that the term "catch and release" is not notable in the sense of the usage described in the article. The only example given in the article itself does not even qualify under the definition given there and the reference given does not mention the term. There is a reference at the talk page of the article that does mention the term in the sense described in the article, but it is a brief mention and I was not able to find anything else after quite a bit of googling. The term "catch and release" does get used in the U.S. politics, but usually it refers to something completely different, namely in the illegal immigration debate context. The term in the sense given in the article (as a congressional paliamentary tactic) appears to fail WP:N. Nsk92 (talk) 06:02, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. RayAYang (talk) 19:48, 4 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.