Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catch the Sperm


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 14:08, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Catch the Sperm

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Orphaned, no assertion of nobility or sources Will (talk) 21:14, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. I added a source to an int'l health journal to confirm that it exists and was held up as an example of innovative health promotion practice. Article could still stand clean-up. Canuckle 23:08, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. International AIDS Conference abstracts are only very loosely peer reviewed and aren't normally used as an academic citation. Espresso Addict 11:07, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Good point. Here's one of the better game reviews though I'm unsure if source counts as reliable. It's mentioned 3 times in this Quebec goverment document VIDEO GAMES AND SEX ROLES: FROM CYBERSPACE TO SEX EDUCATION, and in numerous unreliable sources such as download sites, game fan sites and a couple EU seminars  Canuckle 00:33, 31 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of medicine-related deletions.   —Espresso Addict 11:07, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep: if Re-Mission exists, then this one should exist as well. One reference and one external link seem to be enough for me in that case. NCurse work 06:24, 26 July 2007 (UTC)


 * keep if this exists then it should be on hereDelighted eyes 04:28, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.