Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cate mackenzie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 12:51, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Cate mackenzie

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Several issues: Article appears to be purely promotional in nature and therefore would seem to breach WP:SPAM (Note that previous incarnations under different titles were deleted for being direct copyvio from subject's own site). Article offers no references to support assertions of notability and coverage, and therefore would seem to breach WP:V. Article subject does not appear to meet BIO criteria for notability under WP:CREATIVE or other BIO notability guidelines (no asserted significant works, secondary coverage, etc. Google News search returns nothing. Google search only returns what appear to be primary/self-promotional sources). Also, while it's possibly not strictly relevant to AfD question, is possibly worth noting that submitting editor also is possibly a SPA with apparent COI issues. Guliolopez (talk) 09:50, 28 April 2009 (UTC) Google news are not an academic source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Emilnovy (talk • contribs) 19:11, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as unnotable subject and protect against re-creation. . .Rcawsey (talk) 11:19, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Probably not eligible for an A7 as there's an assertion of notability, but there's no evidence of actual notability. Tevildo (talk) 18:52, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - nothing notable that can be verified Blue Square Thing (talk) 21:16, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.