Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catharina Meessen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:23, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Catharina Meessen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Wikipedia does not find it interesting either. There is nothing inherently notable about living a long time. John from Idegon (talk) 05:32, 20 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment - Longevity can be a notable factor, at least it's not something to be neglected. Hitro   talk  07:08, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:01, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:01, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:01, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

146.1.1.1 (talk) 19:25, 22 March 2017 (UTC)DM Thompson
 * Delete - Being a centenarian isn't what it used to be--many people are reaching that mark. Beyond that, there is nothing else to distinguish this person. Claim for notability based on one local newspaper article.Glendoremus (talk) 05:47, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - While longevity may not warrant notability, being the last surviving member of a category is, in this case an extinct nationality. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_last_survivors_of_historical_events and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Last_living_survivors
 * Delete If she was the last member of a nationality that might be interesting. The last person who was a member of a very small group of people who lived in an area with a unique status in international law making it jointly administered in two countries, especially when this status was revoked when she was about 6 and has no discernable impact on her life, is not a claim to notability at all.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:48, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete This is trivia. I don't see significant coverage about the subject and neither about the claim to notability. The sources are all human interested stores, and it seems to be a news spike. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 05:19, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Can't find reliable sources.Fails WP:GNG. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   17:55, 27 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.