Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cathedral of the Black Goat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Wknight94 (talk) 01:53, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Cathedral of the Black Goat

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

non-notable organization, no third-party sources, fails WP:V, appears to be intended to promote the organizations website, which is hosted on Angelfire. Has already been speedily deleted at least once for these reasons. Tunnels of Set 17:11, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete no sources, and I get just 63 unique Google hits (and only 48 hits with Wikipedia and mirrors removed. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  17:25, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Starblind :: mikm t 18:48, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Article does NOT fail WP:V, as independent verification can be found at on the production poster for the SOTNCF VII, where the Cathedral logo appears in the top left sponsorship position. Interesting that Tunnels of Set seems intent on removing all organizations from the Satanism category other than the "big three", perhaps given his own outlook we may see a bias? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Frater Iason Rex (talk • contribs) 12:54, 17 January 2007 (UTC).  — Frater Iason Rex (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Comnent, no bias. Please read Wikipedia's notability requirements. A mention on a poster is not verifiability; what verifiability means is that all the facts in the article can be verified in third-party sources such as books, magazines, newpaper articles, etc. Any organization which does not have such media coverage is not considered notable enough to have an article on Wikipedia. Give it another twenty years, if your org still exists... Tunnels of Set 16:25, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Andrew Lenahan; no sources, no article. Angus McLellan (Talk) 01:15, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.