Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catheline Ndamira


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Dings the auto-accept portion of WP:NPOL by virtue of being in Parliament. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 13:10, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Catheline Ndamira

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BIO Legion Legion (talk) 13:13, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:35, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:35, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:35, 14 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete a non-notable businesswoman. This is one of the large groups of non-notable people articles that is about to push us over 1 million articles on living people.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:05, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Politicians who hold national office are usually deemed notable. I have added a link to the Uganda gvmt site.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  11:47, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. To be fair, the article definitely needs improvement, as it's badly written and incredibly unclear about exactly what her job actually is — but she actually is a sitting member of Uganda's federal legislature, which means she has a straight pass of WP:NPOL #1. This does need to be rewritten for clarity and cited to some actual reliable source references, however, so tag it for copyedit and refimprove. Bearcat (talk) 20:57, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep passes WP:NPOL as per this .Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 05:51, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep the subject passes WP:GNG but fails WP:RS. The content of the article cites only one source and the content need more reliable secondary sources. Abishe (talk) 12:49, 19 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.