Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catherine Balavage (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 12:21, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Catherine Balavage
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

The subject does not meet the criteria for notability of living persons. It was also deleted at a previous AFD.— Ryulong ( 竜龙 ) 10:41, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note, primary author may have a COI considering the subject.— Ryulong  ( 竜龙 ) 10:43, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 12:03, 9 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Weak delete. I deprodded this because it has been to AfD before and is therefore not eligible for WP:PROD; however, with some reluctance, I have to agree with the nominator that notability seems to be lacking.  The reluctance is because she seems to be an interesting person, acting in significant projects and producing an "online magazine" whose content seems to get picked up in reliable sources, e.g. this very recent Huffington Post appearance.   However, there's not much independent coverage about her: the interview in Female Arts might qualify, but the other items mentioned on her website press page  rather clearly don't, and I didn't find anything else better.  Unless something else more solid turns up, I'd have to concur with deletion.  Maybe this is just a case of WP:TOOSOON. --Arxiloxos (talk) 18:48, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. She appears to be mainly an extra, with her actual acting credits mainly being in fairly minor productions (fringe theatre, short films, web series, etc.) and there is almost nothing about her online other than what she has posted about herself. 85.210.34.47 (talk) 13:35, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Starhunterfan (talk) 06:10, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Weak delete. Acting in significant projects on a repeated basis. Dribblingscribe 14:56, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * She has not had a major or even supporting role in anything.— Ryulong ( 竜龙 ) 21:02, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Unfortunately there are millions of aspiring actors who also do extras work. She is clearly very driven and hard-working, would be happy to see an article for her when she lands an acting role in a significant production. Bumblebeeman (talk) 00:15, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.